DrugManagementForum.com

Would complete disclosure cure the NDA-rejection rash?

This is a discussion on Would complete disclosure cure the NDA-rejection rash? within the Biotechnology News forum, part of the Industry News and Updates category; John Jenkins, the head of the FDA's Office of New Drugs, has the perfect cure for a chronic rash ...


Go Back   DrugManagementForum.com > Industry News and Updates > Biotechnology News

Register Help Members List Mark Forums Read

Rate This Thread - Would complete disclosure cure the NDA-rejection rash?.

Only registered members can vote. To rate this thread register here.

Reply

 

Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2009, 10:41 AM
automated news aggregator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 965
Default Would complete disclosure cure the NDA-rejection rash?

John Jenkins, the head of the FDA's Office of New Drugs, has the perfect cure for a chronic rash of poorly conceived new drug applications: Sunshine. And plenty of it, according to a piece in The RPM Report. Jenkins suggests that the agency's complete response letters should be made public when a new therapy doesn't make the cut at the FDA. And the prospect of a public lashing by regulators--complete with all the details explaining why the drug was rejected--would go a long way toward improving the average NDA.
"I have to wonder if the complete response letter were released publicly, would you wait to submit your application until it was really ready, so that you would have a better chance of getting a first-cycle approval," he said at the FDA/CMS Summit. If the FDA got better applications, he went on, then maybe the agency wouldn't be stuck at a 30 percent approval rate for first-time NDAs.
"It tells everybody what the issues are," agrees Steve Nissen of the Cleveland Clinic, a frequent critic of the pharma industry. "It allows us to kind of think about it, and allows other companies to understand what the issues are. There's just absolutely no rationale for keeping those letters secret...if we want to restore credibility with the public, then we have to get the black box opened up. This is one of the key reasons why there is a lack of public respect for the process that goes on."
Don't expect a lot of support, though, from the development world. Andrea Masciale, senior director of regulatory affairs for Johnson & Johnson, noted that any release would first have to redact trade secrets. Biotech companies frequently omit any kind of detailed explanation about NDA rejections. It would be hard to imagine that the developers would like to see all the details spilled out in the public.
- here's the story from the The RPM Report
- check out Pharmalot's piece on the discussion
Related Articles:
Pharma's love/hate relationship with Dr. Nissen
FDA still hush-hush on drug rejections


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octreotide Before Surgery Improves Acromegaly Cure Rate industry_news Other Clinical Pharmacy News 0 10-01-2008 01:45 PM
FDA issues Complete Response letters ordering Safety Labeling Changes under FDAAA for Aranesp, Epogen, and Procrit industry_news FDA News 0 07-30-2008 05:45 PM
Complete Steroid Avoidance Worsens Rather Than Improves Liver Transplant Outcome industry_news Other Clinical Pharmacy News 0 07-14-2008 05:31 PM
Labopharm hopes high for tramadol despite rejection industry_news Biotechnology News 0 06-30-2008 11:44 AM


© 2008 DrugManagementForumpowered by
Informaceutica - Drug Management Information Company

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.