DrugManagementForum.com

FDA, NIH partnership promises better science, faster reviews

This is a discussion on FDA, NIH partnership promises better science, faster reviews within the Biotechnology News forum, part of the Industry News and Updates category; The FDA and the NIH say they'll collaborate on a new program aimed at improving the regulatory science used ...


Go Back   DrugManagementForum.com > Industry News and Updates > Biotechnology News

Register Help Members List Mark Forums Read

Rate This Thread - FDA, NIH partnership promises better science, faster reviews.

Only registered members can vote. To rate this thread register here.

Reply

 

Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2010, 10:16 AM
automated news aggregator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default FDA, NIH partnership promises better science, faster reviews

The FDA and the NIH say they'll collaborate on a new program aimed at improving the regulatory science used to review the safety and efficacy of new drugs, promising that better science will lead to swifter decision-making.
"We have allowed the arm of regulatory science to become weak and underdeveloped," FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg told reporters. If not fixed, "instead of pulling us into an exalted future, we will row in circles."
To get the partnership up and running, the agencies agreed to form a committee of six top scientists drawn from both organizations. They will provide $6.75 million over three years to fund regulatory science research. President Obama's proposed budget also includes $25 million to improve the science in use at government agencies. The regulators even announced a few priorities, like shortening the time it takes to test the potency of flu vaccines. Instead of three or four months, the agencies believe that wait can be halved.
HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius promised that "this is going to mean that new treatments are safer and available sooner."
Anyone outside the vaccine field, though, isn't likely to shorten their timelines on regulatory reviews anytime soon. If scientific committees and small budgets were all it took to transform these agencies' review times, the average cost of development would be much smaller than it is today.
- here's the story from the Los Angeles Times
- and here's the Bloomberg piece
Related Articles:
FDA nominee sees need for confidence boost
Study: Biomedical research funding is slowing


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Updating Comparative Effectiveness Reviews industry_news Comparative Effectiveness Updates 0 10-27-2009 09:14 AM
Abatacept and Other Biologics for RA: Cochrane Reviews industry_news Other Clinical Pharmacy News 0 10-23-2009 01:26 PM
Value of comparative effectiveness reviews diana.papshev Managed Care Pharmacy Administrative Issues 4 07-31-2008 03:39 PM
Comparative reviews of fibromyalgia therapies participant1 Managed Care Issues for Oral Drugs 1 07-22-2008 04:29 PM
Herbal Science International, Inc. Recalls Twelve Dietary Herbal Supplements Nationwide Because of Possible Health Risk industry_news FDA Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts 0 04-11-2008 10:28 AM


© 2008 DrugManagementForumpowered by
Informaceutica - Drug Management Information Company

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM.