This is a discussion on FDA proposes controversial release of complete response letters within the Biotechnology News forum, part of the Industry News and Updates category; After a long-simmering controversy over regulatory transparency, an FDA task force has proposed releasing its complete response letters to ...
|
|||||||
| Register | Help | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
After a long-simmering controversy over regulatory transparency, an FDA task force has proposed releasing its complete response letters to drug developers as part of a wide-ranging plan to let the sun shine in on safety issues, plant inspections and the agency's specific reasons for rejecting a new drug application.
BIO has yet to respond to the set of 21 proposals assembled by an FDA task force headed by FDA Principal Deputy Commissioner Joshua Sharfstein. Despite some deep-seated reluctance on the part of developers, the movement toward opening up has been gaining steam for years as controversies erupted over the dangers presented by marketed drugs like Vioxx. Currently, developers have complete discretion to release all or none of the FDA's concerns outlined in its complete response letters, documents that can delay and even kill a new therapeutic. And on more than one occasion developers have been harshly criticized for spinning the contents in their favor. The head of the agency's new drugs office, John Jenkins, said a few months ago that seven out of 10 NDAs lack critical information. Publishing the letters could go a long way to avoiding future pratfalls by developers, Jenkins said. The FDA task force also called for the agency to open up any time a drug application is placed on hold, terminated or withdrawn. "We should have done this a long time ago," Scott Gottlieb, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and FDA deputy commissioner for medical and scientific affairs during the Bush administration. "The public deserves to see the agency's explanations for its decisions." "Investors are frustrated because very often you have companies that like to spin what is in those complete response letters, and there's no way to know what's really in them," Capitol Street analyst Ipsita Smolinski told Reuters. This way, "there's no question. Everybody has access to the same information." - here's the story from Bloomberg Related Articles: FDA reform advocates want trial, data transparency FDA looks for transparency options FDA wants more details on panel members' potential conflicts More... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FDA Proposes More Transparency in Advisory Committee Conflicts of Interests | industry_news | Other Clinical Pharmacy News | 0 | 04-21-2010 08:19 PM |
| Would complete disclosure cure the NDA-rejection rash? | industry_news | Biotechnology News | 0 | 12-10-2009 11:41 AM |
| FDA issues Complete Response letters ordering Safety Labeling Changes under FDAAA for Aranesp, Epogen, and Procrit | industry_news | FDA News | 0 | 07-30-2008 06:45 PM |
| Complete Steroid Avoidance Worsens Rather Than Improves Liver Transplant Outcome | industry_news | Other Clinical Pharmacy News | 0 | 07-14-2008 06:31 PM |
| FDA goes neutral with new response letters | industry_news | Biotechnology News | 0 | 07-10-2008 06:00 PM |