DrugManagementForum.com

Which biotechs are the least efficient?

This is a discussion on Which biotechs are the least efficient? within the Biotechnology News forum, part of the Industry News and Updates category; SmartTrend has looked at the biotech industry to determine which companies are the least efficient. Using Revenue Per Employee (RPE)--...


Go Back   DrugManagementForum.com > Industry News and Updates > Biotechnology News

Register Help Members List Mark Forums Read

Rate This Thread - Which biotechs are the least efficient?.

Only registered members can vote. To rate this thread register here.

Reply

 

Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2010, 12:49 PM
automated news aggregator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default Which biotechs are the least efficient?

SmartTrend has looked at the biotech industry to determine which companies are the least efficient. Using Revenue Per Employee (RPE)--a ratio useful when comparing a company against others in its industry--SmartTrend found the five public companies that have the lowest efficiency relative to the size of their workforce. As is the case for many biotechs, these companies have little or no revenue but have spent million of dollars--and multiple years--moving drugs through the clinical trials process.
1. MannKind (MKND, RPE of $0K): Valencia, CA-based MannKind is developing an inhaled insulin product called Afrezza, which it hopes can revolutionize how diabetes is treated. MannKind has gone back and forth with the FDA over Afrezza data and is now anticipating a decision on the drug in late December. In 2008 MannKind had one of the largest R&D budgets in all of biotech.
2. Orexigen Therapeutics (OREX, RPE of $1K): Orexigen is one of three company trying to get weight-loss drugs to the market. It's lead program is the weight-loss, dieabetes and depression drug Contrave. Despite promising clinical data, the drugmaker faces an uphill battle gaining approval for its obesity drug--an area which has been plagued by safety issues.
3. Aastrom Biosciences (ASTM, RPE of $3K): Aastrom is developing a drug for congestive heart failure using cardiac repair cells, which contain stem and early progenitor cells extracted from the patient's marrow. The FDA has twice place a clinical hold on a Phase II trial of the drug, but both times it has been lifted.
4. Cell Therapeutics (CTCI, RPE of $3K): The FDA recently Cell Therapeutics' NDA for Pixuvri (pixantrone) for relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The agency was doubted whether the drug was effective, and was underwhelmed by the company's ability to enroll just 140 of a planned 320 patients in the trial. New trials of the drug are planned, but Cell Therapeutics cut 36 employees following the FDA decision.
5. Hemispherx Biopharma (HEB, RPE of $4K): Last year the FDA issued a demand for more information from a new, 300-person trial of Hemispherx's for chronic fatigue syndrome drug Ampligen. Hoping to overcome the FDA's concerns, Hemispherx submitted new preclinical data for the drug to regulators and is still awaiting an FDA decision. The drug has been in development for 20 years.
- here's the ranking
Related Articles:
E&Y: A resilient biotech industry registers its first profitable year
Study: Lower prices don't harm innovation
Drug R&D spending surges in sinking economy


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Survey says: Canadian biotechs in big trouble industry_news Biotechnology News 0 07-16-2009 01:01 PM
Merck Serono to invest $55M in start-up biotechs industry_news Biotechnology News 0 03-23-2009 11:12 AM
More biotechs lobby against biogenerics industry_news Biotechnology News 0 12-10-2008 03:24 AM


© 2008 DrugManagementForumpowered by
Informaceutica - Drug Management Information Company

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 AM.