DrugManagementForum.com

Growth hormone for a new member with cranial irradiation

This is a discussion on Growth hormone for a new member with cranial irradiation within the Managed Care Issues for Injectable Drugs forum, part of the Managed Care Drug Coverage category; If a member has growth hormone deficiency due to cranial irradiation is the provocative stimuli testing still required? We have ...


Go Back   DrugManagementForum.com > Managed Care Drug Coverage > Managed Care Issues for Injectable Drugs

Register Help Members List Mark Forums Read

Rate This Thread - Growth hormone for a new member with cranial irradiation.

Only registered members can vote. To rate this thread register here.

Reply

 

Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 03:41 PM
participant1's Avatar
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 83
Default Growth hormone for a new member with cranial irradiation

If a member has growth hormone deficiency due to cranial irradiation is the provocative stimuli testing still required? We have a new member, who's been on growth hormone therapy prior to the enrollment but this person is not meeting our policy criteria for >2 provocative stimuli tests (the auxologic criteria have been met)...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 03:07 PM
chantell.reagan's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 724
Default Re: Growth hormone for a new member with cranial irradiation

The NICE guidance regarding the use of recombinant human growth hormone in children states that patients with cranial irradiation should have an appropriate growth hormone (GH) provocation test; however, only 1 test (as opposed to at least 2 for a primary deficiency) is required. Cigna's policy for GH is consistent with these recommendations. Also note that this specific issue is not addressed in the AACE guidelines, but it is stated that in cases of complete hypopituitarism it is possible to establish GH deficiency through IGF-I testing.

However, in theory, as this patient has been receiving therapy, GH provocative stimuli and IGF-I tests may not be appropriate unless treatment is discontinued and there is adequate washout period. Considering that GH deficiency is linked to a specific cause in this case (radiation therapy) and the patient has been receiving treatment, denial of coverage and interruption of therapy for the purposes of confirming diagnosis may not be clinically appropriate.


References

1. NHS. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of growth hormone (somatropin) in children with growth failure. June 2005. NICE guidance on growth hormone Accessed May 14, 2008.

2. Cigna. HealthCare Coverage Position. Coverage Position #4012. November 2007.
Cigna coverage position Accessed May 14,2008.

3. AACE. Medical guidelines for clinical practice for growth hormone use in adults and children, 2003 update.
AACE growth hormone guidelines Accessed May 14, 2008.

Last edited by diana.papshev : 06-03-2008 at 12:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SPOTLIGHT: Biotech sector poised for growth industry_news Biotechnology News 0 04-01-2008 02:02 PM


© 2008 DrugManagementForumpowered by
Informaceutica - Drug Management Information Company

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.